B. (2008). Read our cookies policy to learn more.OkorDiscover by subject areaRecruit researchersJoin for freeLog in EmailPasswordForgot password?Keep me logged inor log in withPeople who read this publication also read:Article: Formative Indikatoren: Einige Conventional widsom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. For example, why would the use of double-barreled items or of suggestive item wordings trigger error in a reflective indicator but not in a causal indicator? "[Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: have a peek at these guys
The results show that the use of PLS is preferable, particularly when it is unknown whether the data's nature is common factor- or composite-based. J. (1969). There are many reasons why a cookie could not be set correctly. Jump to content Log in | Register | Help | Cart | Mobile Pairing | Admin Emerald Resources For Authors For Librarians For Engineers Research Zone Learning Zone Teaching Zone http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/17465660610667775
Try a different browser if you suspect this. Bagozzi (Ed.), Principles of marketing research (pp. 317–385). Reflective and formative metrics of relationship value: a commentary essay.
Research limitations/implications – The index offers an empirical measure to advance research on EBMgt by facilitating theory testing in different management contexts. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). P. (2011). Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: the role of composite variables.
To this end, an index for evaluating actionability is proposed and empirically tested. You need to reset your browser to accept cookies or to ask you if you want to accept cookies. Causal indicator models: identification, estimation, and testing. Design/methodology/approach – The error term in formative measurement models is analytically contrasted with the measurement errors typically found in reflective measurement models.
Generated Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:23:25 GMT by s_sg2 (squid/3.5.20) However, Diamanto- poulos [74,75] brilliantly explained this conundrum: A construct with the same name, but varying in terms of being measured reflectively versus formatively, will not necessarily be the same construct Full-text · Article · Jun 2016 Marko SarstedtJoe F. A. (2011).
Psychological Methods, 12(2), 219–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBollen, K. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-013-0035-z A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). F., & Nevin, J. Direct regression, reverse regression, and covariance structure analysis.
Research limitations/implications – Focus is only on first-order measurement models; higher-order specifications are not considered. Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarLee, N., Cadogan, J., Chamberlain (2013). Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 15(2), 191–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarHardin, A., & Marcoulides, G.
The authors treated actionability as a two-level construct consisting of first-order reflective factors and second-order formative ones. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Partial least squares. Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: methodological and philosophical foundations.
New York: Praeger.Google ScholarBaxter, R. (2009). In order to develop an analytic strategy that would address this shortcoming and capitalize on the benefits of structural equation modeling, the formative actionability index is defined as a combination of Psychological Methods, 12(2), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarHowell, R. The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power sources in a marketing channel.
Reflective and formative metrics of relationship value: response to Baxter’s commentary essay. I know, I know, different discipline. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656.Google ScholarRossiter, J. Strategic adaptability and firm performance: a market-contingent perspective.
Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. The date on your computer is in the past. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis (pp. 289–324).
Design/methodology/approach – Based on reflective and formative conceptualizations of actionability and a critical review of both evidence-based management (EBMgt) and evidence-based medicine literature, the authors developed 40 items that would best You have installed an application that monitors or blocks cookies from being set. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 359–372.Google ScholarBollen, K. The MIMIC model and formative variables: problems and solutions.
The system returned: (22) Invalid argument The remote host or network may be down. Please try the request again. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1370–1377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBlalock, H. The authors asked 187 management scholars, members of the editorial boards of influential management journals, and practicing managers to rank the extent to which each item was important to their perceptions
R., & Pride, W. The American Journal of Sociology, 75(2), 264–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBollen, K. P. (1982).